Jump to content

Rice distribution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the 2D plane, pick a fixed point at distance ν from the origin. Generate a distribution of 2D points centered around that point, where the x and y coordinates are chosen independently from a Gaussian distribution with standard deviation σ (blue region). If R is the distance from these points to the origin, then R has a Rice distribution.
Probability density function
Rice probability density functions σ = 1.0
Cumulative distribution function
Rice cumulative distribution functions σ = 1.0
Notation
Parameters , distance between the reference point and the center of the bivariate distribution,
, scale
Support
PDF
CDF

where Q1 is the Marcum Q-function
Mean
Variance
Skewness (complicated)
Excess kurtosis (complicated)

In probability theory, the Rice distribution or Rician distribution (or, less commonly, Ricean distribution) is the probability distribution of the magnitude of a circularly symmetric bivariate normal random variable, possibly with non-zero mean (noncentral). It was named after Stephen O. Rice (1907–1986).

Characterization

[edit]

The probability density function is

where I0(z) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind with order zero, and H(x) is the Heaviside unit step.[1]

In the context of Rician fading, the distribution is often also rewritten using the shape parameter , defined as the ratio of the power contributions by line-of-sight path to the remaining multipaths, and the scale parameter , defined as the total power received in all paths.[2]

The characteristic function of the Rice distribution is given as:[3][4]

where is one of Horn's confluent hypergeometric functions with two variables and convergent for all finite values of and ⁠⁠. It is given by:[5][6]

where

is the rising factorial.

Properties

[edit]

Moments

[edit]

The first few raw moments are:

and, in general, the raw moments are given by

Here ⁠⁠ denotes a Laguerre polynomial:

where is the confluent hypergeometric function of the first kind. When ⁠⁠ is even, the raw moments become simple polynomials in ⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠, as in the examples above.

For the case ⁠⁠:

The second central moment, the variance, is

Note that indicates the square of the Laguerre polynomial ⁠⁠, not the generalized Laguerre polynomial ⁠⁠.

[edit]
  • if where and are statistically independent normal random variables and is any real number.
  • Another case where comes from the following steps:
    1. Generate having a Poisson distribution with parameter (also mean, for a Poisson) ⁠⁠.
    2. Generate having a chi-squared distribution with ⁠⁠ degrees of freedom.
    3. Set
  • If then has a noncentral chi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom and noncentrality parameter ⁠⁠.
  • If then has a noncentral chi distribution with two degrees of freedom and noncentrality parameter ⁠⁠.
  • If then ⁠⁠, i.e., for the special case of the Rice distribution given by , the distribution becomes the Rayleigh distribution, for which the variance is ⁠⁠.
  • If then has an exponential distribution.[7]
  • If then has an Inverse Rician distribution.[8]
  • The folded normal distribution is the univariate restriction of the Rice distribution.

Limiting cases

[edit]

For large values of the argument, the Laguerre polynomial becomes[9]

It is seen that as ⁠⁠ becomes large or ⁠⁠ becomes small, the mean becomes ⁠⁠ and the variance becomes ⁠⁠.

The transition to a Gaussian approximation proceeds as follows. From Bessel function theory we have

so, in the large region, an asymptotic expansion of the Rician distribution:

Moreover, when the density is concentrated around and because of the Gaussian exponent, we can also write and finally get the Normal approximation

The approximation becomes usable for ⁠⁠.

Parameter estimation (Koay inversion technique)

[edit]

There are three different methods for estimating the parameters of the Rice distribution, (1) method of moments,[10][11][12][13] (2) method of maximum likelihood,[10][11][12][14] and (3) method of least squares.[citation needed] In the first two methods the interest is in estimating the parameters of the distribution, ⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠, from a sample of data. This can be done using the method of moments, e.g., the sample mean and the sample standard deviation. The sample mean is an estimate of ⁠⁠ and the sample standard deviation is an estimate of ⁠⁠.

The following is an efficient method, known as the "Koay inversion technique".[15] for solving the estimating equations, based on the sample mean and the sample standard deviation, simultaneously . This inversion technique is also known as the fixed point formula of SNR. Earlier works[10][16] on the method of moments usually use a root-finding method to solve the problem, which is not efficient.

First, the ratio of the sample mean to the sample standard deviation is defined as ⁠⁠, i.e., ⁠⁠. The fixed point formula of SNR is expressed as

where is the ratio of the parameters, i.e., ⁠⁠, and is given by:

where and are modified Bessel functions of the first kind.

Note that is a scaling factor of and is related to by:

To find the fixed point, ⁠⁠, of ⁠⁠, an initial solution is selected, ⁠⁠, that is greater than the lower bound, which is and occurs when [15] (Notice that this is the of a Rayleigh distribution). This provides a starting point for the iteration, which uses functional composition,[clarification needed] and this continues until is less than some small positive value. Here, denotes the composition of the same function, ⁠⁠, times. In practice, we associate the final for some integer as the fixed point, ⁠⁠, i.e., ⁠⁠.

Once the fixed point is found, the estimates and are found through the scaling function, ⁠⁠, as follows:

and

To speed up the iteration even more, one can use the Newton's method of root-finding.[15] This particular approach is highly efficient.

Applications

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ↑ Johnson, Norman L., Samuel Kotz, and Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan. Continuous univariate distributions, volume 1. Vol. 1. John wiley & sons, 1994.
  2. ↑ Abdi, A. and Tepedelenlioglu, C. and Kaveh, M. and Giannakis, G., "On the estimation of the K parameter for the Rice fading distribution", IEEE Communications Letters, March 2001, pp. 92–94
  3. ↑ Liu 2007 (in one of Horn's confluent hypergeometric functions with two variables).
  4. ↑ Annamalai 2000 (in a sum of infinite series).
  5. ↑ Erdelyi 1953.
  6. ↑ Srivastava 1985.
  7. ↑ Richards, M.A., Rice Distribution for RCS, Georgia Institute of Technology (Sep 2006)
  8. ↑ Jones, Jessica L., Joyce McLaughlin, and Daniel Renzi. "The noise distribution in a shear wave speed image computed using arrival times at fixed spatial positions.", Inverse Problems 33.5 (2017): 055012.
  9. ↑ Abramowitz and Stegun (1968) §13.5.1
  10. 1 2 3 Talukdar et al. 1991
  11. 1 2 Bonny et al. 1996
  12. 1 2 Sijbers et al. 1998
  13. ↑ den Dekker and Sijbers 2014
  14. ↑ Varadarajan and Haldar 2015
  15. 1 2 3 Koay et al. 2006 (known as the SNR fixed point formula).
  16. ↑ Abdi 2001
  17. ↑ "Ballistipedia". Retrieved 4 May 2014.
  18. ↑ Beaulieu, Norman C; Hemachandra, Kasun (September 2011). "Novel Representations for the Bivariate Rician Distribution". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 59 (11): 2951–2954. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2011.092011.090171. S2CID 1221747.
  19. ↑ Dharmawansa, Prathapasinghe; Rajatheva, Nandana; Tellambura, Chinthananda (March 2009). "New Series Representation for the Trivariate Non-Central Chi-Squared Distribution" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Communications. 57 (3): 665–675. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2009.03.070083. S2CID 15706035.
  20. ↑ Laskar, J. (1 July 2008). "Chaotic diffusion in the Solar System". Icarus. 196 (1): 1–15. arXiv:0802.3371. Bibcode:2008Icar..196....1L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.017. ISSN 0019-1035. S2CID 11586168.
  21. ↑ Gudbjartsson, HáKon; Patz, Samuel (December 1995). "The rician distribution of noisy mri data". Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 34 (6): 910–914. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340618.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]