David H. Hansson (@DHH) sparked the āTDD being deadāĀ latest twitter storm. DHH is no stranger to controversy, and he certainly picked the right title for it. Of course, the responses followed immediately. and most of them fell directly into his trap.
Most people were defending TDD. How? By saying that Ruby on Rails (originally authored by DHH) was built so badly that TDD was bound to fail on it. Others said DHH simply doesnāt understand TDD, and heās a bad influence on software newbies. And some cited their excellent record in TDD and how it all made sense and created exquisite code.Ā They were worried of the impact the article will have on people who donāt understand enough about the topic.
There was a very small minority saying DHH is right, and that TDD was a fad that didnāt live to its promise. They also mentioned failed experiences. Too few voices.
Since I like TDD andĀ promote it wherever I go, you might think Iād join the pro-TDDists.
Not this time.
TDD doesnāt always work
Anyone who says differently is selling something. So, letās just ignore the fact that many of the TDD supporters live off TDD in some way (coaches, trainers, yours truly as well). They have an interest in TDD promoted as good, (much like SAFe), and this kind of publicity is bad publicity. But letās put that aside.
The TDD proponents actually believe that TDD is the best tool for the job. And it many times is.
But surely not all of the time, and for all people. There is no silver bullet, remember?
It may be that with enough experience and acquired skill, we can apply TDD to many problems, with ease and success. Not always.
When I started doing TDD, I dismissed it quickly as good in theory, butĀ not likely to work in real life. It didnāt work for me then.
Many people in the beginning think the same. Some of them keep working in TDD and see the value, again in some cases. Some drop it off completely.
Itās ok to experience bad TDD.
DHH was right about one more thing, though
Did you notice how quickly (minutes!!) the discussion became about DHH the person, his understanding and skills? Rather than making the discussions about where TDD helps, and where it doesnāt.
Weāre really good at religious wars in the software world, arenāt we? Isnāt it ironic that agile always happen in context, but if someone decides to against the stream, and heās suddenly and obviously heās wrong?
From contextual ideas to instant dogma in minutes!
As Uncle Bob Martin said in his response (in the more important 2nd half, of the article), TDD is a good tool, and many have found it worked for them.Ā And as he said, if other tools provide the benefits of TDD, go ahead with them.
I second that. Let me quote one of my favorite sentences in software (somehow related to Bob):
āWe are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it.ā
Weāre not done uncovering yet. TDD is one item we found on our journey, there are others.
| Reference: | TDD Is Dead? Letās Kill The Messenger Instead! from our JCG partner Gil Zilberfeld at the Geek Out of Water blog. |
TDD is not for everyone… TDD is not for me. As many of us I have tried TDD by letter and dismissed it in its purest form. Why I have tried it and why should everyone try it? TDD provides very powerful message in the form of mantra, i.e. Red-Green-Refactor. Although I do not follow TDD I always keep it in mind as a reminder to (1) write as minimum amount of code as possible before testing it; (2) always test your code; (3) and the most important, after your small piece of code works DO NOT forget to refactor.… Read more »