You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Vitest 5.1.0 declarations import ESTree from Vite, breaking type-checking with Vite 7 #11942
I came across your Vitest issue (#11942) and the repro repo. Good report.
I’m working on an open-source project where we try AI coding assistants on small, real engineering problems. I’m looking for people who reported a problem they’d actually like fixed, and I wanted to ask whether you’d be open to letting an assistant take a run at yours.
The idea is simple: you describe what you expect and what “done” means in your own words. The assistant gets those requirements and a clean checkout of Vitest, and nothing from this issue beyond what you choose to tell me. If it gets stuck, I pass the question back to you.
Afterwards, you decide whether the result is useful. You can reject it completely, keep it for yourself, or do whatever you want with it. There’s no commitment to open a PR or contribute anything upstream.
If that sounds interesting, I can send you the short set of questions I’d use to define the task. If not, no worries.
Activity
Ksander215 commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Hi Maximilian,
I came across your Vitest issue (#11942) and the repro repo. Good report.
I’m working on an open-source project where we try AI coding assistants on small, real engineering problems. I’m looking for people who reported a problem they’d actually like fixed, and I wanted to ask whether you’d be open to letting an assistant take a run at yours.
The idea is simple: you describe what you expect and what “done” means in your own words. The assistant gets those requirements and a clean checkout of Vitest, and nothing from this issue beyond what you choose to tell me. If it gets stuck, I pass the question back to you.
Afterwards, you decide whether the result is useful. You can reject it completely, keep it for yourself, or do whatever you want with it. There’s no commitment to open a PR or contribute anything upstream.
If that sounds interesting, I can send you the short set of questions I’d use to define the task. If not, no worries.