Skip to content

Stabilize the process namespaceΒ #3041

Description

@ChrsMark

Area(s)

area:process

The System Semantic Conventions Working Group works towards stabilising the process namespace. The remaining work is reflected within the respective board view: System Semantic Convention Working Group (view)

This issue will serve as a place to gather any final working items and a place to discuss any final issues you may have before stabilization occurs.

Remaining items:

FYI @open-telemetry/semconv-system-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-semconv-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-semconv-maintainers

Activity

  1. moved this from Need triage to Accepted in SemConv Issue Triageon Nov 7, 2025
  2. osullivandonal commented on Jan 29, 2026

    @osullivandonal
    Member

    At present the System Semconv stability WG (discussed at 29-01-2026 meeting.) is happy to go from development to release_candidate, with the exception that two outstanding issues listed above are completed:

  3. ChrsMark commented on Feb 10, 2026

    @ChrsMark
    MemberAuthor

    Given that #1181 is actually an enhancement I would be fine adding it later, whenever it's ready.

    With the completion of #864 we should be good to proceed with the promotion of process.* to release_candidate (hopefully by KubeConEU [26']).

    @open-telemetry/semconv-system-approvers WDYT? Would this expectation be realistic?

  4. mx-psi commented on Feb 10, 2026

    @mx-psi
    Member

    I think that's realistic, I'd say we should spend next meeting solely on #864

  5. ChrsMark commented on Feb 12, 2026

    @ChrsMark
    MemberAuthor

    We discussed that with the System SemConv SIG (Thursday Feb 12th) and it seems that we should revisit the Process Entity attributes in general before moving on with the promotion to the release_candidate. This will cover #864.

    Also we should verify the metric's attributes and their requirement level as #3107 tried to do.

    The above are the major 2 leftovers for the process.* namespace.

  6. rogercoll commented on May 29, 2026

    @rogercoll
    Contributor

    Reopening:

  7. osullivandonal commented on Aug 27, 2026

    @osullivandonal
    Member

    Can we reopen this as process namespace has only gone release candidate cc @ChrsMark , @rogercoll

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    Priority

    None yet

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions