Skip to content

upstream PR lane: the crossing workflows keep upstream's triggers, and compare_query_hashes.py crosses with them (#217) - #218

Merged
tae898 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
upstream-lane-fixes
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

tae898 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
upstream-lane-fixes

Conversation

@tae898

@tae898 tae898 commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #217.

Two defects in the generated upstream pull request branch. The examples workflow runs scripts/compare_query_hashes.py after example 10, but examples/scripts is excluded, so on upstream's CI that step would fail in every example job; the generator re-includes that one file. And our copies of the two crossing workflows differ from upstream's in the trigger block for fork-only reasons (push on main only, no workflow_run on a Release workflow), with a comment naming fork tooling; the generator now splices upstream's trigger block in front of the rest of our file and stops if the marker comment is missing.

Checked in the post-release sync clone with --no-push: 105 files, +9,977/-1,931; the trigger block of both workflows is identical to upstream-main's; the only non-bindings/python paths are the two workflows.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ubz3m6QXHESerCkehC1qgi

…examples workflow, the crossing workflows keep upstream's trigger block (#217)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ubz3m6QXHESerCkehC1qgi
@tae898
tae898 merged commit b9db91c into main Oct 6, 2026
2 checks passed
@tae898
tae898 deleted the upstream-lane-fixes branch October 6, 2026 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

upstream PR lane: the crossing workflows keep upstream's triggers, and compare_query_hashes.py crosses with them

1 participant