Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Simetrical 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Simetrical

[edit]

Final (78/38/6) ended 04:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Simetrical (talk · contribs) – Today I found out about a considerable issue with Wikipedia. This issue was preventing Wikipedia from functioning at its full potential. The issue? Simetrical is not an administrator. This guy has been around since late 2004, working consistently since then, particularly in the last six months. For the editcounters, he has over 5000 edits, a surely satisfactory count. He's got 1000 edits in project namespace, and has consistent participation in project pages such as Articles for Deletion and the Village Pump. He knows what he's doing, he's sane, and he's going to be of considerable use to the project. Werdna (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: See also my previous nomination, of about six months ago. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 23:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Support
  1. As nominator. Werdna (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  2. robchurch | talk 00:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    Jaranda wat's sup 00:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  3. Support Rama's Arrow 00:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  4. Support. Good question answers. Mangojuicetalk 00:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  5. Support.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 01:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  6. Hrm, thought he was already an admin Support hoopydinkConas tá tú? 00:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  7. Support. DarthVader 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    Support I see nothing wrong, good user, will be an excellent admin. Yanksox (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC) I'm going to abstain now, given other concerns. Yanksox 18:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)reply
  8. Strong support - I've interacted with this user: very polite; would be great with the admin tools. —Mets501 (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  9. Support per nom. Roy A.A. 02:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  10. Support As the nominator said, Simetrical has a significant number of great contributions to project-space. joturner 03:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  11. Support - Draeco 03:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  12. Firm Support. Was pleasant to speak with you on IRC regarding the fair use issue, thank you. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    How-come-I-don't-know-you-yet-? Support - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    Withdrawn - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)reply
    Support - Experienced editor with needs of admin tools. --WinHunter (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC) Changed to neutralreply
  13. Support Why is this guy not an admin yet? Agent 86 06:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  14. Support so that Wikipedia can function at its full potential. Yamaguchi先生 06:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    Support Our paths have crossed in the past, and I confident he will be an asset. -- Avi 07:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  15. Support per WP:1Portal, just kidding. But seriously, no need for more edit stats, I already am confident in this user without stats.Voice-of-All 08:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  16. Support --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 09:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  17. Hrm, thought he was already an admin Support --mboverload@ 09:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  18. Support Absolutely :-). Anonymous__Anonymous 09:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  19. Support. Yes, why not? Stifle (talk) 10:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  20. Support. Satisfies my requirements to be an admin. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  21. Support. Good, trustworthy editor will make a great admin --Peripitus (Talk) 12:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  22. Support. Good and responsible contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  23. Support great editor, moved to support per the response below.--Andeh 12:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  24. Support with a Hrm as above. -- Omniplex 13:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  25. Definite support. RandyWang (raves/rants) 13:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  26. support duh. --W.marsh 14:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  27. support anything less would be criminal --Vengeful Cynic 14:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  28. Support Joe I 14:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
    Support older ≠ wiser 14:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Sorry, but changing to neutral.reply
  29. Support We need more users like him! --Siva1979Talk to me 18:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  30. Support Just what I am looking for in an administrator. I know he will do well. --WillMak050389 19:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  31. Support per nom, good answers to questions, and insightful essay on adminship on his user page. --Elkman 19:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
  32. Support with pleasure. Everything below (and lots more on your user page) convinces me you'd make a fine admin. Also, I don't think you need to necessarily recuse yourself from AFD just because of your opinions. It would be one thing if you used your admin powers to close AFDs against consensus, but you seem too fair to do such a thing, and assuming you become an admin, the community will have placed its trust in you to be fair in such situations. If you feel you couldn't be unbiased in that case, though, and do avoid them because of that, then that just further convinces me of your honesty. Great candidate, whatever you may use the tools for. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂