User talk:67Unknown67

Welcome!

Hi 67Unknown67! I noticed your contributions to 2026 Pakistan Super League and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -𝘼𝓷𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓐 𝙇𝓪𝓻𝙠𝓐 ^{𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨} 07:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you bro 67Unknown67 (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello, I'm Anjana Larka. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pakistan Super League, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia links can't be used as reference in the articles. 𝘼𝓷𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓐 𝙇𝓪𝓻𝙠𝓐 ^{𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨} 14:17, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Edinburgh Castle Rockers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edinburgh Castle Rockers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Castle Rockers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Godknowme1 (talk) 05:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

According to ETPL the first 3 teams were confirmed: Irish wolfs, castle rockers, Amsterdam flames 67Unknown67 (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edinburgh Castle Rockers (April 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Unsourced, and nothing to show how it has gained notability since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Castle Rockers.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Edinburgh Castle Rockers to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 13:53, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, 67Unknown67! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:53, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to European T20 Premier League. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Western Premiership One moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Western Premiership One. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 13:22, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Western District Cricket Union for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western District Cricket Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western District Cricket Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Vestrian24Bio 13:37, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Western Premiership One. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Vestrian24Bio 13:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Western Premiership One by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Vestrian24Bio 13:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Western Premiership One for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Premiership One, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Premiership One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Western District Cricket Union.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Western District Cricket Union.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Hello, I'm TurquoiseGoose. I noticed that one or more of your recent contribution attempts to Draft:Amsterdam Flames have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 00:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, there could you please have a look at Draft:Amsterdam Flames and just give us a hint if it ready to be changed into an article yet

many thanks 67Unknown67 (talk) 00:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, the AfC reviewer's comment says to wait for the first edition of the competition to take place to submit the draft, and I am seconding that too. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 00:40, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Thilio. A comment that you recently posted to [[:Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests]] seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 17:25, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Drafts

Hello, 67Unknown67, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in draft space, such as Draft:Glasgow Cosmic are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories three times in four days, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know I did not realise that thanks 67Unknown67 (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glasgow Cosmic (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Guninvalid, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Far too many citations to espncricinfo.com, which I have no reason to believe is reliable.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Glasgow Cosmic to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

guninvalid (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

haha 67 67 guninvalid (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)