Debt issuance costs under ASC 835-30 and IFRS 9: net presentation and amortization

Under US GAAP, costs to issue a recognized term loan or bond are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt, in the same way as a debt discount, and their amortization is reported as interest expense. IFRS 9 reaches the same balance sheet result by a different route: transaction costs are deducted from the fair value of a financial liability measured at amortized cost at initial recognition, so the liability starts below its principal amount and accretes back through the effective interest rate.

The two frameworks part ways on revolving credit facilities and on the costs and fees paid when existing debt is modified. A US registrant may defer the upfront fee on a line of credit as an asset and amortize it straight-line over the facility term, whether or not anything is drawn. An IFRS reporter decides whether a drawdown is expected, and that judgement determines whether the fee becomes part of the effective interest rate of a future loan or a cost of liquidity spread over the commitment period.

On a 50,000,000 USD five-year loan with 1,250,000 USD of lender and third-party fees, both frameworks produce an effective interest rate of about 6.60% against a 6.00% coupon and the same 16,250,000 USD of total interest expense over the life of the loan.

··········

⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣

WHAT COUNTS AS A DEBT ISSUANCE COST.

Debt issuance costs are the incremental costs of obtaining financing: arrangement and underwriting fees, legal fees for drafting the credit agreement, advisory and placement fees, rating agency fees for the specific issue, registration and filing fees, and transfer taxes or stamp duties. The test in both frameworks is whether the cost would have been avoided if the debt had not been issued.

IFRS 9 states the test in its definition of transaction costs: incremental costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, issue or disposal of a financial asset or financial liability, where an incremental cost is one that would not have been incurred if the entity had not acquired, issued or disposed of the instrument. Paragraph B5.4.8 lists fees and commissions paid to agents, advisers, brokers and dealers, levies by regulatory agencies and security exchanges, and transfer taxes and duties, and excludes debt premiums or discounts, financing costs and internal administrative or holding costs.

US GAAP draws the line in a similar place. Salaries of the treasury team, general corporate overhead and the cost of a financing that was explored and abandoned are expensed as incurred under both frameworks. Fees paid directly to the lender are usually treated as a reduction of the proceeds, which makes them economically a discount, while fees paid to third parties are debt issuance costs. Since the issue of ASU 2015-03 both categories are presented the same way on the balance sheet for a recognized term debt liability, but the distinction still drives the accounting when the debt is later modified.

Costs incurred before the debt is recognized raise a timing question. In the basis for conclusions of ASU 2015-03 the FASB acknowledged that issuance costs can be paid before the proceeds arrive and noted that entities in practice defer them and apply them against the proceeds when received. The IFRS Interpretations Committee discussed the IFRS 9 version of the same question at its June 2025 meeting, looking at how an entity decides whether costs incurred before entering into the contract are incremental and how they are carried until the instrument is recognized.

··········

HOW ASC 835-30 PRESENTS DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS AFTER ASU 2015-03.

Before ASU 2015-03, US GAAP presented debt issuance costs as a deferred charge in assets. The update, issued in April 2015, changed only the presentation. Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are now shown as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that liability, consistent with debt discounts, and the amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The FASB stated that the recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs was not affected.

The amended guidance in Subtopic 835-30 requires the description of the note to include the effective interest rate, and the face amount of the note to be disclosed in the financial statements or the notes. Debt liabilities that an entity reports at fair value fall outside this presentation guidance, because under the fair value option issuance costs are expensed when incurred. The implementation example in the Codification shows long-term debt as the principal amount less a single line for unamortized discount and debt issuance costs.

Amortization follows the interest method: the unamortized costs are released so that interest expense equals the carrying amount at the start of each period multiplied by a constant effective rate. US GAAP permits a simpler method, such as straight-line, only when the result is not materially different from the interest method. For a five-year term loan with a bullet repayment the difference is usually small, but it grows with longer tenors, larger fees and amortizing principal.

ASU 2015-03 became effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and for other entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 with interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Transition was retrospective, with the disclosures required for a change in accounting principle.

··········

LINE-OF-CREDIT FEES UNDER ASC 835-30-S45-1.

ASU 2015-03 did not address revolving credit facilities, where an entity may pay an upfront fee for a commitment it never draws. At the EITF meeting of June 18, 2015, the SEC staff announced that it would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset and amortizing them ratably over the term of the arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings. ASU 2015-15, issued in August 2015, added this announcement to the Codification as paragraph 835-30-S45-1.

The practical result is that most US companies with a revolver show the unamortized facility fee in other assets, current and noncurrent as appropriate, and record straight-line amortization in interest expense. The guidance is an SEC staff position, so private companies commonly apply it by analogy; an entity that instead nets the fee against drawn revolver balances needs a consistent policy and an approach for periods when nothing is drawn. Commitment fees charged on the undrawn portion over time are period costs recognized as they accrue.

Payments for debt issue costs are financing cash outflows under ASC 230, which lists them among the cash outflows for financing activities. Payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, including premiums and fees paid to lenders directly related to the extinguishment, are also financing outflows, with accrued interest excluded. The amortization itself is a noncash adjustment in operating cash flows under the indirect method. The related classification choices for interest paid are covered in the guide to how interest and dividends are classified in cash flows under IAS 7 and ASC 230.

··········

HOW IFRS 9 TREATS TRANSACTION COSTS ON FINANCIAL LIABILITIES.

Under IFRS 9 a financial liability that is not measured at fair value through profit or loss is initially recognized at fair value minus the transaction costs directly attributable to its issue. For a loan issued at market terms the fair value is the cash received, so the initial carrying amount equals the net proceeds after fees. The liability is then measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, and the effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash payments to that initial carrying amount.

Fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate of the liability are included in the calculation, whether they are paid to the lender or to third parties. The issuer's net carrying amount is therefore the only number on the face of the statement of financial position, and there is no separate asset or contra account required by the standard. Many IFRS reporters still disclose the gross principal and the unamortized costs in the borrowings note because covenant calculations and maturity tables use contractual amounts.

Fees on undrawn facilities require a judgement that US GAAP avoids. IFRS 9 treats loan commitment fees as part of the effective interest rate of the resulting loan when the commitment is expected to lead to a borrowing. In practice an issuer that expects to draw on a facility defers the upfront fee and deducts it from the liability when the drawdown occurs; to the extent no drawdown is expected, the fee is treated as a payment for liquidity services, carried as a prepayment and amortized over the period of the facility. Entities reassess the expectation as circumstances change and disclose the policy they apply.

Modifications are the second point of divergence. Paragraph B3.3.6 includes any fees paid net of any fees received in the 10 per cent test that determines whether a modification of a financial liability is an extinguishment. Under paragraph B3.3.6A, if the modification is accounted for as an extinguishment, costs or fees incurred are recognized as part of the gain or loss on extinguishment; if it is not, they adjust the carrying amount of the liability and are amortized over the remaining term. The IASB's Amortised Cost Measurement project considered in September 2026 staff recommendations to clarify which costs and fees are covered by this requirement, with no decision recorded in that paper.

··········

ASC 835-30 VS IFRS 9: DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS COMPARED.

........

Issue	US GAAP (ASC 835-30)	IFRS 9
Term debt costs	Direct deduction from debt	Deducted from initial carrying amount
Amortization method	Interest method; straight-line if not materially different	Effective interest method
Income statement line	Interest expense	Finance costs
Undrawn revolver fee	Asset, straight-line over term (SEC staff view)	Depends on whether drawdown is expected
Debt at fair value	Costs expensed	Costs expensed (FVTPL)
Costs on modification (no extinguishment)	Lender fees amortized; third-party costs expensed	Costs and fees adjust carrying amount
Costs on extinguishment	Lender fees in gain or loss; third-party costs deferred on new debt	Costs and fees in gain or loss
Cash flow statement	Financing outflow	Usually financing outflow

........

The modification rows carry the largest practical difference. Under the US GAAP debt modification guidance in Subtopic 470-50, fees paid to the lender and third-party costs are treated in opposite ways: in a modification that is not an extinguishment, lender fees are amortized with the existing unamortized discount and costs, and third-party costs are expensed; in an extinguishment, lender fees enter the gain or loss and third-party costs are deferred and amortized as issuance costs of the new debt. IFRS 9 applies one rule to costs and fees whichever party receives them.

··········

[[ADPLUS_300x250_1]]

WORKED EXAMPLE: A 50 MILLION USD TERM LOAN WITH 1.25 MILLION USD OF FEES.

On January 1, 2027, a company borrows 50,000,000 USD under a five-year bullet term loan with a fixed coupon of 6.00% paid annually on December 31. The lender withholds an arrangement fee of 500,000 USD from the proceeds, and the company pays 750,000 USD of legal, advisory and rating fees to third parties. Internal treasury time spent on the deal, estimated at 80,000 USD, is expensed under both frameworks. All figures are illustrative.

Net cash received is 49,250,000 USD from the lender, and after the third-party payments the net proceeds are 48,750,000 USD. The effective interest rate that discounts five coupons of 3,000,000 USD and the 50,000,000 USD repayment to 48,750,000 USD is 6.6033%. The schedule below applies to an IFRS reporter and to a US GAAP reporter using the interest method.

........

Year	Opening carrying amount	Interest expense at 6.6033%	Coupon paid	Amortization of costs	Closing carrying amount	Unamortized costs
2027	48,750,000.00	3,219,091.14	3,000,000.00	219,091.14	48,969,091.14	1,030,908.86
2028	48,969,091.14	3,233,558.31	3,000,000.00	233,558.31	49,202,649.45	797,350.55
2029	49,202,649.45	3,248,980.78	3,000,000.00	248,980.78	49,451,630.23	548,369.77
2030	49,451,630.23	3,265,421.64	3,000,000.00	265,421.64	49,717,051.87	282,948.13
2031	49,717,051.87	3,282,948.13	3,000,000.00	282,948.13	50,000,000.00	0.00
Total		16,250,000.00	15,000,000.00	1,250,000.00

........

Total interest expense of 16,250,000 USD equals the 15,000,000 USD of coupons plus the 1,250,000 USD of fees. Straight-line amortization would release 250,000 USD a year, which is 30,908.86 USD more than the interest method in 2027 and 32,948.13 USD less in 2031. Whether that gap is material is an entity-level judgement, and most preparers avoid the question by building the effective interest schedule, using the same mechanics shown in the guide to loan amortization schedules in Excel with Copilot, Claude or ChatGPT.

The journal entries are identical in amount under both frameworks for this term loan.

........

Date	Account	Debit (USD)	Credit (USD)
Jan 1, 2027	Cash (lender proceeds)	49,250,000.00
Jan 1, 2027	Term loan, net of costs		49,250,000.00
Jan 1, 2027	Term loan, net of costs	750,000.00
Jan 1, 2027	Cash (third-party fees)		750,000.00
Jan 1, 2027	Administrative expense (internal costs)	80,000.00
Jan 1, 2027	Accrued expenses or cash		80,000.00
Dec 31, 2027	Interest expense	3,219,091.14
Dec 31, 2027	Cash (coupon)		3,000,000.00
Dec 31, 2027	Term loan, net of costs		219,091.14
Total		53,299,091.14	53,299,091.14

........

At December 31, 2027, a US GAAP balance sheet shows the term loan as principal of 50,000,000.00 USD less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of 1,030,908.86 USD, for a carrying amount of 48,969,091.14 USD, with the 6.6033% effective rate in the debt note. An IFRS statement of financial position shows borrowings of 48,969,091.14 USD; the gross principal and the unamortized costs typically appear in the note. Many companies keep the principal and the unamortized costs in separate ledger accounts so that both presentations come from one set of balances. The general mechanics of discount accretion are the same as those described for bonds payable under the effective interest rate method.

The same company also signs a five-year 100,000,000 USD revolving credit facility and pays an upfront fee of 600,000 USD. Under the SEC staff view in ASC 835-30-S45-1 it records a 600,000 USD asset and amortizes 120,000 USD a year to interest expense, drawn or undrawn. An IFRS reporter that does not expect to draw on the facility reaches the same 120,000 USD annual charge as a liquidity cost. If it expects a full drawdown at a known date, it defers the fee and deducts it from the drawn liability, and the fee then enters the effective interest rate of the borrowing.

··········

PRESENTATION, DISCLOSURE AND COVENANT EFFECTS.

Netting changes reported debt ratios. Reported debt is lower than contractual debt by the unamortized costs, so ratios computed from the balance sheet differ slightly from those computed from principal. Credit agreements usually define debt by reference to principal outstanding, which is why lenders and analysts rebuild gross figures from the notes. A practical way to keep covenant packs consistent is to report both numbers, as discussed in the overview of loans payable, interest accrual, amortization schedules and covenants.

Disclosure under US GAAP includes the effective interest rate and the face amount of the debt, the unamortized discount and issuance costs, the classification of current and noncurrent portions, and the accounting policy for line-of-credit fees. IFRS reporters disclose the carrying amount of financial liabilities at amortized cost, the interest expense calculated with the effective interest method, maturity analysis on contractual undiscounted cash flows under IFRS 7, and the policy for facility fees and modifications.

··········

⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁤

COMMON ERRORS WITH DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS.

The most frequent error is capitalizing costs that are not incremental: internal salaries, general bank relationship fees, the cost of a financing that never closed, or advisory fees for a broader recapitalization that included equity. When one engagement covers both debt and equity, the cost has to be allocated on a rational basis, with the equity share charged against equity and the debt share treated as issuance costs.

A second error is leaving issuance costs on a revolver in assets after the facility is replaced or reduced. Under US GAAP a reduction in borrowing capacity of a line of credit normally triggers a write-off of a proportionate share of unamortized costs, and a refinancing with a different lender is often an extinguishment. Under IFRS the same events require a fresh look at whether the facility fee relates to an expected borrowing.

A third error is carrying over the term loan schedule after a prepayment or repricing without a new analysis. A voluntary partial prepayment changes the expected cash flows and requires a catch-up adjustment to the carrying amount under the effective interest method, while a repricing has to be tested for extinguishment before any fees are deferred.

A short checklist for the close:

1. Confirm that each capitalized cost is incremental and directly attributable to the specific debt.

2. Split lender fees from third-party costs and keep the split in the ledger.

3. Present term debt net of costs, and revolver fees according to the chosen policy.

4. Recompute the effective interest rate whenever fees, tenor or expected cash flows change.

5. Test each amendment or refinancing for extinguishment before deciding where fees go.

6. Reconcile carrying amount to principal in the debt note and the covenant pack.

··········

DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS UNDER ASC 835-30 AND IFRS 9: WHERE THE ANSWERS DIFFER.

For a plain term loan or bond carried at amortized cost the two frameworks give the same answer: net presentation, the effective interest method and an interest charge that includes the fees. The 50,000,000 USD example produces identical carrying amounts, interest expense and journal entries under ASC 835-30 and IFRS 9.

The answers diverge in three places. Revolver fees are an asset amortized straight-line under the SEC staff view in US GAAP, while IFRS 9 ties the treatment to whether a drawdown is expected. Fees on a modified loan follow the lender versus third-party split of Subtopic 470-50 in US GAAP and a single rule in IFRS 9 paragraph B3.3.6A. Costs incurred before the debt is recognized rely on practice in both frameworks, and the IASB's work on amortized cost measurement may still change the IFRS 9 guidance on costs and fees for modified instruments.

··········

FOLLOW US FOR MORE.

·····

DATA STUDIOS

·····

datastudios.org